Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing ; (36): 304-309, 2022.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-930617

ABSTRACT

Objective:To explore the causes of high noise exposure in PICU, and to provide reference for formulating effective intervention measures to improve the status of noise exposure.Methods:With phenomenological method, eleven nurses of Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine from August to September 2020 were enrolled by purposive sampling method, and joined face-to-face and semi-structured interviews with researchers. Interview data were analyzed by Colaizzi 7-step analysis method.Results:Four themes were extracted, including the characteristics of PICU, difficulty in equipment alarm management, the crying of children which was difficult to appease, and the low level of knowledge, attitude and practice of noise management of medical staff.Conclusions:High noise exposure of PICU is caused by many reasons. Researchers and managers can optimize the equipment alarm management, implement ideal analgesia and sedation and humanistic care, and carry out noise management training to improve the noise exposure in PICU and the quality of clinical nursing.

2.
Journal of Audiology and Speech Pathology ; (6)1997.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-534300

ABSTRACT

Objective To explore the threshold and latency of patients receiving cochlear implantation using electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABR), and to evaluate the significance of EABR applied to those patients.Methods The EABR and ECAP were recorded in 14 subjects who were operated for Nucleus24 cochlear implant.They were assigned to Group A and Group B according to the results of ECAP. The threshholds of EABR, the wave latency of III and V and inter-wave latency of III-V of EABR were compared and analyzed between Group A and Group B.Results The threshholds of EABR were higher in Group B than in Group A on electrode No 22 when the pulse width was 25,50,75,100,125 ?s,respectively. There were significant differences between Group A and Group B(P0.05).Conclusion The threshholds of EABR were lower in patients whose ECAP findings were positive. The latencies of III and V,and inter-wave latency of III–V of EABR had no significant difference according to the positive findings of ECAP.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL